• BuelldozerA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe the second candidate was s*** and nobody wanted to vote for them? Or maybe voters really only wanted the one person.

    • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or, and I think this is more likely, people are used to the idea of marking more than one name invalidating the ballot.

      • BuelldozerA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You think that’s more likely huh? But somehow only in those two heavily minority districts? What are you basing that on?

        • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think it’s just in those minority districts. The article states that it’s WORSE in those districts, that doesn’t mean it’s not a problem elsewhere.

          Maybe they need to put “Vote for Two” in bold or a bigger font or something. Like I said at the top, it’s hard to tell without seeing the ballot design.