• girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ontario’s Health Care Consent Act has been on the books for nearly two decades. Like similar laws in many Canadian provinces—and American states—it sets out the process for making treatment decisions when a patient cannot provide or withhold her consent—when she is in a coma and on life support, for example.

      America has them too. The above is from the same Slate article you linked.

      Maybe don’t just pick and choose portions of an article that match your confirmation bias.

      • BuelldozerA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        America has them too.

        I never said they didn’t but I will point that America’s version pretty much just assigns guardianship and decision making authority to one guardian or another in the case of a dispute. The Ontario version can actually TAKE guardianship from someone and make decisions about care on their own authority.

        Regardless of how it works in America the point stands. Canada’s “Death Panels” were not a fabrication. The “Consent and Capacity Board” of Ontario exists.

        • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d much prefer a panel if doctors deciding my fate rather than my mother or my father who may be blinded by their own emotions.

          Even more if my family members were part of a sect like the Jehovah’s witnesses, for whom not even blood transfusions are acceptable. How stupid do you have to be to leave a loved one to die just to follow the instructions given by illiterate people living 2000 years ago? This kind of decisions should be informed but should also have limits around them. Keeping religion outside if this realm should be a very clear one for instance

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wow at the gymnastics and hoop jumping of that article to try to apply a term that does not match the common fear mongering use of the word or even the situation. Classic clickbait headline.

      You should listen to the podcast.

      • BuelldozerA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wow at the gymnastics and hoop jumping of that article to try to apply a term that does not match the common fear mongering use of the word or even the situation.

        Care to point out the “gymnastics and hoop jumping” in the article? Canada does in fact have Governmental bodies that can and will over ride the wishes of close family and / or guardians even when doing so will mean someone’s death. In Ontario that body is called the " Consent and Capacity Board.". That isn’t “fear mongering” it’s fact and it definitely matches up with the commonly used idea behind the idiom “Death Panel”.

        I don’t need to listen to a 24 minute podcast to learn something that the government of Ontario has already openly talked about.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lol you want people to read your links while you ignore other people’s links. LOLOLOLOLOLOL. The very definition of living in a self chosen echo chamber of clickbait headlines.