• APassenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree.

    So anything done that is better than the worst President in victory should go unchallenged?

    We are Lemmings, aren’t we (in the debunked mythological running of a cliff sense)?

    There was a ceasefire, that was good. After instructing people not to call for one, it was helpful to see that.

    Biden would get my vote in a general. But we have to stop making the worst decision maker the baseline.

    • Hitmonchad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is unfortunately less of a social phenomenon and more of a logical result of our combination two-party/first past the post system. After years of having to strategically vote against the worst option instead of for the best, we are only left with a “lesser of two evils” decision.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I vote for Swalwell, happily. That’s my district.

        I still write him at times to encourage some types of things or express disagreement with others. Trump’s existence matters almost nothing in that calculus.

        Same would apply to Biden. We can hold people accountable and disagree with decisions while still voting for them.

        We need not become unquestioning sheep. And polls matter.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      we have to stop making the worst decision maker the baseline.

      The worst decision maker is literally the other option.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For voting, yes. But for accountability or assessing competence?

        No. We have other ways of assessing competence. And those need not lead to lost votes.