What began as a simple publication online quickly sparked a dispute online, particularly on X, as users began to point out examples of alleged misallocations of EU funds. Politicians and the media subsequently commented on the matter, calling for answers.
I don’t say this is not true and there is no misuse, but I am very reluctant as all we know for now comes from social media posts “particularly on X”. The EU and Poland must investigate that, but I don’t trust what users say if there is no further evidence, particularly it comes from X.
[Edit typo.]
I think this is exactly why it’s important to be able to investigate allegations w/o people being convicted “in the court of public opinion” ahead of time.
With the size that our societies have grown to, it’s possible for a whole lot of people to have edge-case experiences that are at significant odds with the majority. Often, it might be untrue, but other times it can be the early warning sign of developing systemic issues.
Recognizing and investigating these kinds of things early, is how to avoid pervasive problems. If there isn’t an issue, then, sure, the resources spent on investigating are wasted, but there is no harm aside from this and actually helps reinforce confidence in society.