• athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think that person is ‘under-dressed’

    He’s sitting there in the full heat of the day, wearing a long sleeved shirt and full-length trousers and tall socks, perfectly comfortable in the sun.

    She’s sitting in an air conditioned bubble, wearing mid-arm sleeves, and mid-thigh shorts, at a time when Capri pants were considered fashionable yet still a bit scandalous.

    If he’s comfortable with full-length everything in the sun, she’s definitely under-dressed in her air-conditioned bubble.

      • athos77@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, because (like so many other 1950’s advertisements) this image is from the male viewpoint: he’s relaxed in his lounger, perfectly content smoking a pipe and having a drink, while his wife is literally on display in front of him, cheerfully smiling and happy while she does the work and he stretches out watching her. In images like this, the male is assumed to be perfectly comfortable, and the comfort of the woman isn’t considered much at all. [Why, yes, honey, I was perfectly happy wrangling the kids and their homework this afternoon, getting them and the house pristine for you coming home from work. I even had time to cook a full dinner from scratch, clean the kitchen, take a shower, do my hair and makeup and put on jewelry! Here, have a drink while I take your coat and briefcase and help you on with your slippers!]