Lemmy Today
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Rant@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · 4 days ago

Why do you think I USE search operators?

lemmy.dbzer0.com

message-square
13
link
fedilink
69

Why do you think I USE search operators?

lemmy.dbzer0.com

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Rant@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · 4 days ago
message-square
13
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • egrets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Brave’s not the only search engine to do this, but it’s just one of a million reasons not to use Brave. They’re a scummy company. From this Reddit post:

    In 2016, Brave promised to remove banner ads from websites and replace them with their own, basically trying to extract money directly from websites without the consent of their owners

    In the same year, CEO Brendan Eich unilaterally added a fringe, pay-to-win Wikipedia clone into the default search engine list.

    In 2018, Tom Scott and other creators noticed Brave was soliciting donations in their names without their knowledge or consent.

    In 2020, Brave got caught injecting URLs with affiliate codes when users tried browsing to various websites.

    Also in 2020, they silently started injecting ads into their home page backgrounds, pocketing the revenue. There was a lot of pushback: “the sponsored backgrounds give a bad first impression.”

    In 2021, Brave’s TOR window was found leaking DNS queries, and a patch was only widely deployed after articles called them out.

    In 2022, Brave floated the idea of further discouraging users from disabling sponsored messages.

    In 2023, Brave got caught installing a paid VPN service on users’ computers without their consent.

    Also in 2023, Brave got caught scraping and reselling people’s data with their custom web crawler, which was designed specifically not to announce itself to website owners.

    In 2024, Brave gave up on providing advanced fingerprint protection, citing flawed statistics (people who would enable the protection would likely disable Brave telemetry).

    In 2025, Brave staff publish an article endorsing PrivacyTests and say they “work with legitimate testing sites” like them. This article fails to disclose PrivacyTests is run by a Brave Senior Architect.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      YIKES

      Thank you

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is duckduckgo browser a better alternative? I have An android phone.

      The search seemed better

      • evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        DDG is garbage:

        http://techrights.org/2021/03/15/duckduckgo-in-2021/

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, DDG have a pretty good reputation for privacy and reliability, although there have been small controversies in the past. They mainly use Bing, plus their own crawler and direct data sources where applicable.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    All of the search engines I’ve used do this and it is infuriating. If my search returns little or no results, then so be it. Don’t populate my results with bullshit you thought I meant; you’ll almost always get it wrong. I didn’t mind the “did you mean”; it was a suggestion, and a choice that I could decide if I wanted or not. Now they just cram results down my throat, whether I want them or not.

    I miss the early 2000s Internet.

  • Albbi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    I really hate that search engines feel like they have to return a bunch of results no matter what, like the Google Play Store. Even if they don’t have what you want, they’ll give results for what they think is similar, and just ads. It’s infuriating looking through results trying to find if the thing you’re looking for is buried in a bunch of useless stuff.

  • aquafunkalisticbootywhap@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I started paying for kagi when I learned it works more like classic (vintage?) search engines. More focused on accurate results, which may be a few or nil, instead of mangling your terms into something they can sell & insert the highest paying advert that matches something close.

    I have not been disappointed. They also do AI stuff, if youre into that. Or you can toggle it off, and never use their assistant.

  • evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s too short to qualify as a rant. Do whatever necessary to get some outrage built up, then come back to us with ~3 or so paragraphs.

    If you need help, consider using the “angrier” parameter with 5 peppers on this page: https://goblin.tools/Formalizer

  • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    “spouse husband”?

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      OP couldn’t remember the name of the 1980s Canadian rock band “Loverboy”

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Someone I met was calling their husband that. I wanted to see if the phrase was a thing.

      I am not able to see that though, because I’m not allowed to look for it. It could tell me “no results” and that would be information, but refusing to limit the search to EXACTLY WHAT I’M LOOKING FOR is stupid.

  • starchylemming@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    related to that:

    do you know any search engine that actually accepts commands in image search?

    like every single one i tried ignores the “-”

    i want to exclude certain tags goddammit

    was it always like this?

Rant@lemmy.sdf.org

rant@lemmy.sdf.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !rant@lemmy.sdf.org

A place where you can rant to your heart’s content.

Rules :
  1. Follow all of Lemmy code of conduct.
  2. Be respectful to others, even if they’re the subject of your rant. Realize that you can be angry at someone without denigrating them.
  3. Keep it on Topic. Memes about ranting are allowed for now, but will be banned if they start to become more prevalent than actual rants.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 6 users / day
  • 202 users / week
  • 536 users / month
  • 556 users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 470 subscribers
  • 70 Posts
  • 273 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org