• happyhippo@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s just appreciate the fact that basically no other browser has this.

      With chrome/ium you can’t even block ads.

      • 9up999@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a lie sir. Brave blocks ads out of the box. Vivaldi also has ad block filters. You can add custom filters to both browsers. Also edge has shitty ad blocker. Kiwi browser supports almost all chrome extensions. Basically almost all except chrome and still you can block most of the ads using correct dns server.

          • 9up999@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Firefox is as much botnet as others. Full of telemetry, diagnostics, pocket and other shit. That’s why there are secure forks. Firefox in stock form is as much botnet as others. Also firefox is selling out to the same google so don’t pretent it’s better because it’s not.

        • pedro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry but even with all that said, you’ll never lure me to the evil side. I’m sticking with Firefox until it dies an atrocious death

        • Forkk@forkk.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Firefox already supported ublock origin on mobile and a handful of other extensions. This is just them opening it up to more extensions.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll soon be forced to allow sideloading, in the EU at least. Should open the doors for proper alternative browsers.

      • TheEntity@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        65
        ·
        1 year ago

        I loathe the very fact they made people call it “sideloading”. It’s just installing on your own terms, like it used to be the norm.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, it’s a carry over from its early days in how it used to work. You needed to install things via USB debugger. Generally that’s all sideloading ever meant, transferring information from one device to another using a generally “local” method (SD card, USB, etc). Now sideloading, on Android at least (as it retains its original meaning elsewhere), just means not from the official repository.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just activated Windows 10 on a laptop I bought from ebay, and I was reminded that Microsoft too wants people to view its official store as the default way to obtain software.

            One of my goals for this weekend is to set up a dual boot for Linux Mint, which I’ve never done before. I’m fully aware of its limitations, but I’m getting so tired of all this crap.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I have an old laptop that I’m planning to use to test different versions of Linux so I can get a feel for it. I will let you know if I have questions. I appreciate the kind offer!

            • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I’m not sure what Microsoft is attempting with S mode. Its just such a half baked concept to me. I’d rather a simplified group policy interface or something if they wanted simplified restrictions.

              But yeah, dual booting is a great way to transition. You can also do Windows in a VM, but not sure how licensing works or if you can use an OEM license in there.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It just seems much better for me to set up a dual boot. I know it’s more work, but it’s not like it’s irreversible, and I think it would give me a better experience overall.

                • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are a few Linux distros I can recommend as someone who started doing this as a little tinker project when I was younger.

                  Pop_OS! Is a really great basic setup to help usher you into Linux. I installed the KDE desktop environment onto my install because I really like and enjoy the KDE experience. You have plenty of other Ubuntu “flavors” to choose from. I’d recommend giving them all a whirl or look and decide which one you think is the best fit for you.

                  ElementaryOS is great if you want a semi-MacOS experience but I feel it is perfect for someone who doesn’t want to tinker around too much or for family members to use on their 10 year old laptops/desktops.

                  I also recommend not fully setting your Linux side up (email, saving documents, etc.) until you get done with your testing different distros out. You’ll be thankful you didn’t go through the full setup process if you decide to try a new distro out. Have fun, and remember it’s all a learning experience. Don’t be afraid to ask for question or look anything up. If you finally find a distro you want to make permanent and remember me, I’d love to hear what you settled on. Have a wonderful rest of your day. And enjoy your newfound freedom! 😌

        • Aasikki@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you can sideload anything you want, why would that be the case? I don’t think there’s a technical limitation, they just don’t allow it on the app store if it doesn’t use safari.

          • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh that’s true, I always thought iOS just didn’t have that capability at all but that makes sense that it would just be blocked at the App Store level.

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you can sideload an app there’s nothing Apple can do to stop you from shipping a new rendering engine.

          • realharo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They can still prevent the JIT from working because the resulting native code would not be signed. That would result in worse JavaScript performance in such browsers, but considering today’s hardware and software optimizations, it may not matter that much in practice.

            • maynarkh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, but the point of the law is that apps that you install that are not from the official store actually have to work. It even has clauses so that installing stuff from different sources than Apple can’t intentionally be a worse experience than the official app IIRC. That might be just for messaging though.

    • jvrava9@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very sad that Firefox does not provide an .ipa file of firefox without webkit. Jailbroken, trollstore and altstore users could benefit of extensions before apple allows sideloading.

  • GenEcon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use FF on android for a couple months now. Solid browser and sync to desktol and add blocker are nice.

    BUT: their page reloading is far too aggressive. You can’t buy anything online, since once 2FA is required and you need to open your bank app, confirm, and switch back, the page reloads and the 2FA didn’t get through. Tickets and such are the only reason I have still chrome installed.

  • twistedtxb@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For those who don’t know yet: Firefox Nightly for Android let you install any extension you desire.

    You just need to create a custom collection on the web site and link your ID in nightly.

  • bankimu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    My goodness that’s awesome. I never understood why they locked it down in the first place about a year ago. What changed?

    • lostmypasswordanew@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They wanted to have compatibility with Chrome extensions. But that was all just a n EEE move by Google. More perfidious since they created the open standard in the first place

  • suny@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    great, now waiting for them to finally fix the supremely janky tab behavior.

    • berg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you tried sidebery? When I found tree layout for tabs to be a thing I haven’t looked back.

  • 9up999@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Installed firefox yesterday. Nothing really changed or improved. Uninstalled firefox.

    • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s 3 clicks to install AdBlock on Firefox mobile and that alone instantly makes it superior to Chrome.

      • 1984
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ublock origin is better I believe.

        • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ublock origin is actually #1 on top of the list and the one I have installed, I was using “adblock” as a generic term.

          As far as I can tell, chrome mobile does not support ublock origin like firefox mobile does.

    • randint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is the main reason you (presumably) use Chrome over Firefox? People here might be able to help you solve the problem.

      • 9up999@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        In general what chromium browsers have out of the box in firefox you have to install addons to have that functionality and still it’s worse experience. For example pwa support. Worst thing is that websites and now software only supports chromium.

        • monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          1 year ago

          Firefox mobile has pwa support, which works well for me and I never had a website that doesnt work on firefox (except for google earth maybe).

          • voxel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            pwa support is extremely limited on android firefox, but I don’t really care. web apps are slow and I’d much rather use native apps…

          • z500@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It works, but for whatever reason it’ll die and go blank on me whenever I switch to another app, then I have to kill it and reopen it.

          • spiderman@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            but people don’t care about tests, they care only about what’s fast and comfortable for their device. maybe firefox might be a better option for users in the latter once the browser plug-ins come to play.

            • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              On my 3 year old budget model android phone, things run fast 99% of the time. I have considered myself a power user for years. Having said all of that, I’ve recently switched from chrome to Firefox on android and it definitely feels not noticeably slower. I don’t doubt you, it’s just that phone hardware has gotten so good that decent software rarely (feels like at least) pushes it to the limit for more than fractions of a second at a time.

              • spiderman@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                it’s just that phone hardware has gotten so good that decent software rarely (feels like at least) pushes it to the limit for more than fractions of a second at a time.

                I second this, processing time and network speeds have been getting better over the years. The difference in speed in Chrome and Firefox is a “little” noticeable but that’s why I don’t care and use Fennec as my go to browser everyday. I mean, it’s better than the days where it will take more than 20 seconds to load a page.

                Technology has gotten better, all kinds of people have access to the internet these days and use it to learn something, or watch something they like. But it’s kinda sad that big tech companies have started to be greedy and try to either milk them for money or become a monopoly themselves.

          • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Feels exactly the same to me (if not slightly faster due to adblocking). You might just be mistaking familiarity with Chrome for it being tangibly better.

            • monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ive been exclusively using firefox mobile for more than a year but just installed bromite because I had some issues with firefox. Its mostly that scrolling feels smoother, which might just be animation trickery

              • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hm yeah weird. I tried chrome just to test and the scrolling is definitely slightly different but I don’t think it’s smoother. Just kinda tweaked differently I guess. Haven’t tried bromite tho.

    • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally was just telling my partner how much better browsing is since switching to Firefox on android. The ability to install extensions period is a huge upgrade, but also there are several available that are fantastic and not features available on chrome. Not sure what you mean about needing extensions to match chrome features. In fact, none of the extensions I’ve installed are features present in chrome. Plus I can block ads and trackers, activate dark mode everywhere, and use YouTube for audio with my screen off. I am kicking myself for being lazy. On top of giving Google personal data for no reason, I’ve had a worse browsing experience for years.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s funny how some people are willing to use weird android mods that can’t run half of the apps to protect their privacy while others can’t even wait 0.01s longer for a page to load.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good point. Privacy usually means sacrificing some level of convenience.

          Meanwhile, I find most of these convenience tools such as the “Modes and Routines” app and Google Maps timeline to be creepy and dystopian as fuck.

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personnaly I do realize that 99.99% of people run stock android/iOS but sometimes forget and am surprised that the same people don’t have any ad blocker.

    • idle@158436977.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still use it but I have to say the fact that the page auto-refreshes when you leave the app and come back drives me bonkers.

        • EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it’s not that feature, it’s likely either memory tuning or battery optimization stuff. Some phone manufacturers set those values to levels that are more aggressive than they really need to be, leading to processes being terminated in the background when they ideally shouldn’t.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, this is similar to the old Firefox for Android, which is why I like it.

        When you could just browse AMO and add an add-on at will. It was also much smoother.

        • noodlejetski@geddit.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was also much smoother

          now that’s just rose-tinted glasses speaking. I remember how absolutely abysmal old Firefox’ scrolling was, and how they’ve claimed multiple times that they’ve improved it but it was still horribly sluggish compared to Chromium browsers. I’ve been using Firefox Preview (and then Nightly after enough performance improvements have landed on it) for about a year just to have acceptable experience on mobile.

          • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly the one thing I don’t like is how pages constantly refresh when you alt tab (or w/e the equivalent is on Android - swipe tab I guess?). I know it’s a small thing but it just gets at me. I also like the old UI as it was more Firefox-y; the new one is too white and plain.

            • noodlejetski@geddit.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I do miss the tab bar, it would be great to have it on the tablet. I can’t comment on how differently the browser behaves now regarding storing loaded pages in memory though, because most of the time I’d have an underpowered phone that would kick out everything out of memory when switching apps anyway.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you. This is going to be a huge improvement and hopefully get more people to switch from Chrome.

          Hopefully it’s a sign of more good things to come.