• esa@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Between that and the uutils-coreutils, Ubuntu 25.10 sounds like it’ll be an interesting experience for users, especially those with accessibility and internationalisation needs.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Well, they do recommend using LTS releases and the specifically change stuff more drastically on the release before the next LTS release.

    • trevor (he/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I fully agree with you on the accessibility front. It’s not even good on X11, but it’s unusable on Wayland, from what I understand :( Accessibility on Linux needs a massive funding and development initiative, and it needed to be done a long time ago.

      But uutils is pretty solid. I’ve swapped out my GNU coreutils entirely (on Arch, not Ubuntu, because I value my time too much to be troubleshooting broken snaps) and haven’t run into any issues. I think people are underestimating how close the compatibility already is. I’m sure something I use at some point will try to invoke an option that doesn’t exist in the uutils version, but it’s been solid for me so far.

      • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, I think those are just lacking in the internationalisation?

        People like me, who at most have some reading glasses needs and have their computer set to generally English utf-8 will be likely be fine.

        • trevor (he/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          internationalization

          Interesting point. I don’t actually know about that. What can the GNU coreutils do with regard to internationalization? Just the output of commands, or can they also internationalize stuff like command args?

          • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            I’m generally an en_*.UTF-8 user (even tried en_DK.UTF-8 for a bit for a reason we’ll come back to), so I don’t have a complete picture of it and would have to go look at the documentation or source for that, but I’d expect

            • documentation
            • date formats: en_DK.UTF-8 should give you ISO8601-formatted dates, if I can’t have that I at least want DD/MM/YYYY; the US-american nonsense is just plain unacceptable
            • sorting: e.g. Norwegian will have …zæøå and expect aa to be sorted as å, the Swedes have …zåöä, the Germans …zäöü, the Turks will want ı and İ sorted and upper/lowercased correctly, and there are some options around how you deal with “foreign” letters and diacritics.
            • Probably more stuff relating to LC_* that I can’t think of off the top of my head

            but in any case, an ls -l output should be different depending on your locale, and in ways you likely don’t even think about as long as it looks normal.