• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 小时前

      It‘s almost like us humans want to watch the world burn as we tell us „it‘s inevitable“.

  • MyOpinion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 小时前

    Yes. The world is going to the shitter very quickly with the help of Ai.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 小时前

    I think author of the video have to much faith in the technology that is basically search compression engine.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 小时前

      The current generation of LLMs won’t take over the world. It will take several more breakthroughs of a similar magnitude to get anywhere close to AGI. That may still be decades away but it could also happen next Tuesday.

      • vane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 小时前

        You sound like a lunatic. Nothing will happen, AGI is sales pitch. None of LLM companies are profitable, despite multiple attempts, chat, mpc, agents, deep search, coding, what’s next to keep the train going ? If you think that people can create God from sand wake up. Decadence is progressing, culture is shrinking. We’re collapsing.

        • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 小时前

          I don’t know if we can create AGI. Saying that something is impossible because we haven’t done it yet is disingenuous, though, and has been proven wrong countless times throughout history. None of this has anything to do with religion, by the way.

          • vane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 小时前

            Define AGI, because recently the definition is shifting down to match LLM. In fact we can say we achieved AGI now because we have machine that answers questions. The problem will be when the number of questions will start shrinking not because of number of problems but number of people that understand those problems. That is what is happening now. Don’t believe me, read the statistics about age and workforce. Now put it into urgent need to something to replace those people. After that think what will happen when all those attempts fail.