MHLoppy@fedia.io to Australia@aussie.zone · 13 hours agoAustralia's sunscreen showdown — and why SPF might be misunderstoodwww.sbs.com.auexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkAustralia's sunscreen showdown — and why SPF might be misunderstoodwww.sbs.com.auMHLoppy@fedia.io to Australia@aussie.zone · 13 hours agomessage-square5linkfedilinkfile-text
Here’s what to know about the feud between a popular sunscreen brand and an Australian consumer group [Choice].
minus-squareIlandarlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-210 hours agoI wouldn’t be surprised if Choice fucked this test up. The wide range of results from the Cancer Council products was very strange.
minus-squaregaloisghost@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-28 hours agoPossibly, or the standards are vague. The PR person from the brand that had an SPF of 4’s spin was basically everything is SPF 50 if you put enough on.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Choice fucked this test up. The wide range of results from the Cancer Council products was very strange.
Possibly, or the standards are vague. The PR person from the brand that had an SPF of 4’s spin was basically everything is SPF 50 if you put enough on.