• burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    the thing about Democrats and ‘liberals’ is that its a broad coalition of ideologies and political groups competing for power and having to compromise. we all want to bring about our vision of society and help people, but small differences lead to huge schisms. also, monied interests have undue amounts of power over our institutions.

    conservatives on the other hand are completely united by cruelty and adherence to rigid heirarchies (in spite of how dysfunctional they are), and basically the only issues they ever have in their own base is that something isn’t causing enough pain to people they hate.

    i feel it is important to hold our representatives accountable, but saying things like both sides are exactly the same or complaining about liberals as if they are one cohesive entity has no value outside of pushing people away from politics. there are VERY specific people and groups that are making very bad decisions for Americans, like AIPAC or other big donors that simultaneously fund people like Andrew Cuomo and Donald Trump

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Its silly that you can see one of the unifying concept that holds the Republican coalition together, but liberal one.

      The Democratic gerentocracy embodies the problems of the Democrats. Hell, there’s a significant portion of the Democratic party that are just conservatives now who are disproportionately represented in the leadership. But the thing that holds them together is maintaining power.

      This means they don’t fight if they deem the fallout risk to be too high. They bend a knee in symbolic support and then through all the symbolism and say it was the young progressive who poison them.

      Choosing not to fight, let’s them maintain power. Most of their fight is boxing out other voices from gaining power within their coalition. But when the shit hits the fan, and the Republicans have gained control, the Democrats cry uncle, blame the progressives, and turn to us and ask us, “Who else are you going to vote for?”

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Yah I love how places like Lemmy are packed to overflowing with “radical leftists” who scream murder at liberals and moderates and how broadly appealing progressive policies aren’t going far enough to address [issue X].

      Guys, we’re getting literally murdered out there, figuratively and literally. If there was ever a time to start building larger coalitions, it’s now. No, you’re not getting everything you want. No, we’re not having a revolution, we don’t have the military. Yes, you will have to compromise. And if you hate that word because you think it means walking alongside someone you despise…

      Tough shit.

      Pick an issue, gather allies, overwhelm it, then repeat for the NEXT issue and realize nobody is coming, you may not see a better world in your lifetime, your immediate sense of resignation at this fact is manufactured. Get your shit together. Your personal problems are clouding your thinking.

      They’re winning because they don’t recoil in horror at the idea of working towards mid-way goals or making deals they find distasteful, that’s how they pushed the overton window off the fucking map.

      But yeah, lets continue to fuss over if our flags represent enough people and if [popular content creator] said the word “retard” once, while our administration builds camps and readies for war for funsies.

      edit: just because I’m ready to soak up hate on this, you all also need to make real friends. You don’t build movements in discord, not ones that have impact at least. You are medicating your loneliness while the world burns outside. Get out and push through the discomfort of your introversion, your ADHD, your ASD, your sexual identity insecurity, your looks or your accent or WHATEVER it is that you think is keeping you from being social and building community. We lost because we’re isolated. Online groups don’t count. Don’t reply to me, go outside.

      • iridebikes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Either make compromises with other progressives or continue to let conservatives enact their vision of society to our collective detriment. Those are the options.

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        In this case, at least lately, it less a brush stroke and more of a high resolution camera.

        Once you support extremists, the argument of nuance becomes almost irrelevant to the rest of their victims.

    • pinesolcario@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Both sides currently yell and scream at anyone that doesn’t agree with them unequivocally. I don’t agree with everything liberal, and a few conservative viewpoints I do agree with. But for the most part I consider myself to be a moderate.

      But vocalizing that I disagree with how to do something and both sides will either call me a libtard or a MAGAt.

      This is something both sides have an issue with. So stop saying both sides is wrong. Here is an example that disproves that statement completely.

      All I want is a party by and for the people. Not billionaires. Done with idiocracy and insanity.

      • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        All I want is a party by and for the people

        Never going to happen.

        Political parties are run by the wealthy elite, not “the people”

        There’s nothing to allow for a candidate who is sincere but not connected to big money to succeed at anything but the most local of elections.

        If someone were to win a bigger federal level election with word of mouth and no money, be sure that whatever social media platform that allowed their word to go out and grow was on their side and working in the shadows of their ‘formula’ that promotes some content over others.

        • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I will guarantee that anyone who campaigns on abolishing lobbyists and PAC donations will landslide. Hell, elect me and I’ll do it because I really don’t gaf about money. Extra bonus: I DESPISE Nazis and the Telecommunications Act.

          • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            If you were right it would be happening and they would be winning.

            It just doesn’t happen. If you aren’t D or R you’re not getting party funded, and running independent is fucking hard. If you’re D or R You’ll get primaried to death by a better funded same party opponent who doesn’t mess with the source of said party funding.