Attached: 1 image
Seen on Bluesky:
Guy explains to CEO of Signal (messaging) that it's going to add "AI" to the service. She says no. He insists, not knowing or caring who he's talking down to.
It’s not overtly, as the guy doesn’t seem to care whom he’s talking over. The guys just an ass.
However, because it could be mansplaining, someone’s gonna decide it must be; can only be. Like some fascist screeching “anti-semite!” at the drop of a hat, calling every ass a man-splainer cheapens the term, chills actual discourse and increases the man-splanation amount.
How the fuck is this even mansplaining?
It’s not overtly, as the guy doesn’t seem to care whom he’s talking over. The guys just an ass.
However, because it could be mansplaining, someone’s gonna decide it must be; can only be. Like some fascist screeching “anti-semite!” at the drop of a hat, calling every ass a man-splainer cheapens the term, chills actual discourse and increases the man-splanation amount.
Buckle up.
I hate that I can’t block them without making a fucking mastodon account
You reactionary, habitually incel-adjacent dorks realize their pfps and names are in the post, right.