Attached: 1 image
Seen on Bluesky:
Guy explains to CEO of Signal (messaging) that it's going to add "AI" to the service. She says no. He insists, not knowing or caring who he's talking down to.
I have said before if we invent time machines their sole legal purpose should be to only travel back in time to when some ass’s mom was pregnant with him and to point at her and say “see this bump? in 25 years he’s going to be an insufferable asshole.”
Damn, this dude is so high off of huffing his own farts…He’s insane and chauvinistic because he believes that his opinion has more value than the woman who is a driving force behind Signal.
Edit: Apparently not a LLM simp, just a deluded reply guy fool that is trying to discredit Signal for some potentially dumb and petty reason. Here is a link to a conversation about it on Mastodon, a French Instance, but Auto translation makes this conversation decently easy to follow! https://tooting.ch/@spraoi/114702868206825606
Hmm, by that reasoning and the history presented in those Mastodon posts…It would make sense that this was an attack of credibility instead of simping for LLMs. Strange, I wonder what happened that made him loathe Signal and want to see it lose credibility. Thank you for sharing a bit of the truth behind this odd situation.
Google and co have been trying to extract information from my emails for years. It’s presented as a way to automatically make appointments etc but in reality is probably used to build a thorough profile for advertisement
It gets worse:
I’ve never met a Billy Mitchell that I didn’t hate.
Wow, his brain must be truly amazing to see that ai is being added to almost everything when no one else saw it.
Why did you have to post this follow-up? Now I’m all angried up.
I don’t agree with hitting children as a means of discouraging bad behaviour, but I’m convinced some adults would benefit from being hit a bit more.
I have said before if we invent time machines their sole legal purpose should be to only travel back in time to when some ass’s mom was pregnant with him and to point at her and say “see this bump? in 25 years he’s going to be an insufferable asshole.”
then we offer mom a pill.
Direct action can be surprisingly effective
Gotta love how people don’t understand that “nonprofit” doesn’t mean “we don’t pay our employees and do everything for free”
At least they have heightened pattern recognition. That makes up for being dumb as a plank.
I guess i have the “benefit of heighten pattern recognition,” because I sense a douche outline.
I also have the “benefit of heighten pattern recognition” when I’m playing Bejeweled 3.
Damn, this dude is so high off of huffing his own farts…He’s insane and chauvinistic because he believes that his opinion has more value than the woman who is a driving force behind Signal.
Edit: Apparently not a LLM simp, just a deluded reply guy fool that is trying to discredit Signal for some potentially dumb and petty reason. Here is a link to a conversation about it on Mastodon, a French Instance, but Auto translation makes this conversation decently easy to follow! https://tooting.ch/@spraoi/114702868206825606
Actually, that apparently isn’t true. It just seems like he’s recently developed a grudge against Signal and is trying to discredit it.
I wouldn’t go so far as to characterize him as an LLM evangelist. It is important to keep Hanlon’s razor in mind.
Hmm, by that reasoning and the history presented in those Mastodon posts…It would make sense that this was an attack of credibility instead of simping for LLMs. Strange, I wonder what happened that made him loathe Signal and want to see it lose credibility. Thank you for sharing a bit of the truth behind this odd situation.
I gotta start using this.
No, it’s “heighten pattern recognition.” The incorrect grammar makes it extra convincing.
He’s an idiot.
But if Signal wanted to, on the next Apple OSes and current Android version, you can invoke a small, local LLM without sending user data off-device.
Personally, not sure where the value is: composing messages? summarizing them? Both have been tried and they’re pretty useless.
Google and co have been trying to extract information from my emails for years. It’s presented as a way to automatically make appointments etc but in reality is probably used to build a thorough profile for advertisement
Comes from Apple and Google? It will absolutely send data off device.
I wonder what other settings he doesn’t accept ‘no’ from a woman.