human-driven technology goes brrrrr

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Why are you dismissing this as a possibility?

      They’re not. The burden of proof works in a way that the person making a claim (“they’re sexist”) needs to back it up with evidence. They’re not saying he’s definitively not sexist; they’re saying there’s insufficient evidence.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        But it’s not unreasonable to suspect sexism, even if we don’t know for sure one way or the other. Suspicious behavior isn’t proof of guilt, but it’s still pretty sus 😒

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Okay, but she just responds with the misandrist “why are men”, obviously directly accusing him of being sexist on inconclusive circumstantial evidence. That’s going well beyond “suspecting” him of anything.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            They’re making accusations based on reasonable suspicion. That’s still not going beyond suspicion - it’s not like anyone is calling for any action to be taken against him. He’s not losing his job, or being doxxed, or has protesters outside his house.

            It’s just an accusation in the extremely low stakes Court of public opinion.