• nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is already explicitly illegal but right-wing courts have used “creative” interpretations of law to make it ok. Kinda like civil asset forfeiture, which is clearly and explicitly in violation of the US Constitution. Or “qualified immunity”, which was invented by the USSC with no basis in law to make it so that the government doesn’t really have to follow the US Constitution and could violate civil rights as much as they want.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It helps when you can put people on the court yourself, and then have it rule that presidential immunity covers your insurrection.