This is all mega fallacious as it presumes what the rules a god may impose are. That is unknowable. You cannot make any claims either way. Either you or pascal.
What rules did I presume that Pascal did not? My rebuttal to Pascal was crafted to highlight the errors in his argument by abiding by the same errors in such a way that reverses the conclusion
![[Sephko] ZORORO](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/25740d77-f5c2-4658-87c7-5aced94f0800.jpeg){kind=link}
This is all mega fallacious as it presumes what the rules a god may impose are. That is unknowable. You cannot make any claims either way. Either you or pascal.
If you choose to presume some of “the rules”, like @Squorlple@lemmy.world does, you will have to look at them in their context.
You know, like how you cannot simplify a physical setup by looking at electricity without considering electromagnetism.
What rules did I presume that Pascal did not? My rebuttal to Pascal was crafted to highlight the errors in his argument by abiding by the same errors in such a way that reverses the conclusion