Image is of destruction and damage inside Israel, sourced from this article.


Iran and Israel have struck each other many times over the last few days. There has been a general focus on military facilities and headquarters by both sides, though Israel has also struck oil facilities, civilian structures and hospitals, and in return for this, Iran has struck major scientific centers and the Haifa oil facilities.

Israel appears to have three main aims. First, to collapse the Iranian state, either through shock and breakdown by killing enough senior officials, or via some sort of internal military coup. Second, to try and destroy Iranian nuclear sites and underground missile cities, or at least to paralyze them long enough to achieve the first and third goals. And third, to bring the US into a direct conflict with Iran. This is because the US better equipped to fight them than Israel is (though victory would still not be guaranteed depending on what Iran chooses to do).

Iranian nuclear facilities are hidden deep underground (800 meters), far beyond the depth range of even the most powerful bunker busters (~70 meters or so), and built such that the visible ground entrances are horizontally far away in an unknown direction from the actual underground chambers. Only an extremely competent full-scale American bombing force all simultaneously using multiple of the most powerful conventional (perhaps even nuclear) bunker busters could even hypothetically hope to breach them (and we have seen how, in practice, American bunker busters have largely failed to impair or deter Ansarallah). There are several analysts on both sides who have concluded that it is entirely impossible to physically prevent Iran from building nukes.

I fully expect the US to join the war. I believe the current ambiguity is a deliberate invention of the US while they work to move their military assets into position, and as soon as they are ready, the US will start bombing Iran. After that, Iran’s leadership must - if they haven’t already - harden their hearts, and strike back with no fear, or risk following the path of Libya, Syria, and Iraq, either into either surrender, occupation, or annihilation. Every day where they do not possess a nuke is a day where lives are being lost and cities are being bombed.


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    In NYC Mayoral election news, a long awaited independent pollster (Marist) just dropped the most recent assessment of the race between Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani, and disgraced ex-governor and serial harasser Andrew Cuomo. The poll points to a final round of ranked choice voting victory for Cuomo, and personally I believe that the 55%-45% result is not only very promising for Mamdani, but a deeper look into the poll’s methodology and sample demographics suggests that Mamdani may actually be ahead of Cuomo.

    The actual issues with methodology and those polled:

    Undecided Voter, Polling Methodology’s Big Miss, and Unquantifiable Voter Outreach:

    Up front, it is important to mention that 11% of voters are still undecided. Undecided voters are far more likely to have made their minds up about a candidate with near universal name recognition like Cuomo, who entered the race with >90% name recognition to Zohran’s 12-19%. Most are not truly undecided on a name as ubiquitous as his, and the word “undecided” can mean a few different things in a race of more than 2 candidates WITH the option for ranked choice voting. This poll was only offered in English and Spanish, a bottleneck that likely misses far more Zohran voters than any other voter base. Zohran has by far done the most multilingual outreach of any candidate, and has by far the most multilingual canvassers of any candidate. Additionally, the Zohran campaign is canvassing each neighborhood with campaign materials in languages tailored to the unique makeup of their location (for example, Zohran’s home district of Astoria doing outreach in Bengali, Greek, and Urdu). There are many cases thus far in early voting that Zohran campaign volunteers are the only canvassers of any candidate at a given polling place, and on top of that they are completely saturating the area and covering any possible approach to the polls to give voters and passersby campaign materials. Making inroads into the undecided demographic will be crucial to winning this race, and at times it feels like the Zohran camp is really the only one trying.

    The Cuomo Crushing Quadruple Whammy: Age, Temperature, Urban Density, and Timing Problems

    Something I find to be a glaring issue is that 45% of all polled are voters aged 60 and older, who break heavily to Cuomo. This isn’t at all consistent with previous primary elections, where they make up closer to 35% of voters. Likewise, only using previous elections to determine your sample size does not account for the much more energized younger peoples’ vote for Zohran, who is crushing the under 45 years demographic and especially the under 30 years demographic. Next is something that the pollster could not have predicted, but makes this skew towards the elderly so problematic for making a real prediction is that temperatures will be ~100°F (almost 38°C) across almost all of NYC on Election Day. These temperatures are downright dangerous to the elderly, who will be far more likely to have suppressed turnout in these conditions than any other demographic. This is especially problematic for Cuomo, whose voter base is underrepresented in early voting and skews towards inhabiting parts of the city with far lower urban density, meaning his largely elderly voter base is likely to have to travel further distances on a scorching hot Election Day to reach their polling place, where they are far more likely to end up having to wait to vote than if they had voted early. This is a real quadruple whammy that I have not seen a single news outlet discussing thus far, nor any outreach from the Cuomo campaign to try activate older voters to vote early.

    Blatant Demographic Oversights and Making Voters Who Are Like You, Like You:

    Only 7% of those polled are Asian-American. This seems to be quite an oversight given the fact that these numbers represent the NY state average voter demographic, not that of NYC voter demographic, where Asian-American voters naturally constitute a much higher percent of the electorate and voting totals. Zohran Mamdani, also of South Asian heritage, is far more likely to expand the turnout of this demographic in a primary election, not decrease it compared to previous election averages. Mamdani is carrying large percentages in the Asian-American demographic, and undercounting it when a candidate who is Asian-American is one of the frontrunners is unlikely to give you close to an accurate result. Mamdani is also Muslim, and has made deep inroads with the 700K Muslim New Yorkers, a traditionally underrepresented voter demographic. This pollster only accounts for religions beyond Christianity and Judaism as “other” who account for 10% of those polled. With Israel and Palestine in the forefront of voters’ minds, especially Muslim voters, Zohran being the only strong voice in support of Palestine is likely to help boost those numbers.

    Marist’s Unreliability and Difficulty Predicting Ranked Choices:

    Also of note is that in the 2021 election, Marist had predicted current mayor Eric Adams to cruise into an 11% victory, but that margin came down to only 1% in the final round of ranked choice voting. It is not very hard to poll for voters’ highest ranked candidate, but there is great variance and fluidity in who and where candidates fall within voters’ ranked choices. Many voters already understand that this is essentially a two person race now, and if Cuomo is not their first choice, he is far less likely to be anywhere else on their ballot. This is where pollsters are likely systematically underestimating Mamdani’s chances.

    All things considered, I think this poll points to a much closer race than it lets on, especially with a 4% MOE that already puts a tie within statistical reasonability. This polling was conducted only a short time after Zohran’s AOC endorsement, and before Bernie’s endorsement. I don’t want to be overly optimistic, but I think this is Mamdani’s campaign to lose.