“I voted for him to put his dick in my mouth & he did it. Later, he said he’d do it again & again. I could have left him, but I stayed hoping to get fucked instead.”
All it takes it them telling a judge they need to use it to make it legal. Sue them if you think it is illegal, but my guess is they’ll file evidence under seal & have the judge tell you they had authority.
Oh really… please tell me what you did to stop them from installing their surveillance networks. Did you vote?
“Oh tell me what she did to stop me from putting my dick in her? Did she say no?”
If you insist on using sexual language here, which is really a weird obsession on your part, the analogy would be…
“They voted for & elected me to put my dick in their mouth. So I did. I couldn’t hear what they were saying while my dick was in there though.”
“The woman chose the man that didn’t explicitly say that he was going to rape her so that man has a right to rape her anyway”
The reason for the sexual language is that it’s more immediately intuitive/tactile to understand for most people.
https://www.ktvu.com/news/newsoms-office-to-fund-freeway-camera-pilot-program
https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/04/02/governor-newsom-announces-contract-to-install-480-new-high-tech-cameras-in-east-bay-to-improve-public-safety/
https://calmatters.org/newsletters/whatmatters/2021/01/newsom-national-guard-potential-violence/
“I voted for him to put his dick in my mouth & he did it. Later, he said he’d do it again & again. I could have left him, but I stayed hoping to get fucked instead.”
The cameras weren’t installed assuming the data would’ve been shared. In fact it’s illegal to do so.
The cameras were installed though. You gave them the opportunity.
Fair
But
Its still illegal to share the data and people didn’t give “consent” to share the data
All it takes it them telling a judge they need to use it to make it legal. Sue them if you think it is illegal, but my guess is they’ll file evidence under seal & have the judge tell you they had authority.
you know I did dawg