• ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    All well and good, but submarine reactors are extremely tricksy, and having the experience in designing and building them is a massive advantage. It’s a whole other order than any WW2 technology. See the issues France has had.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      At least the fully employed us scientists, full of national pride, won’t jump ship and help them, out of fear of their totally not crumbling state coming after then.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It sounds like you’re talking about the experience that France has in designing and building them being a massive advantage, which I agree with, which is why they’re going to be an important part of the group. The hardest things to do are the things that are the most worth doing. Laziness and efficiency are the same thing, and our relentless pursuit of efficiency in every possible thing has made us unfathomably lazy. It’s time to invest in some thoughtful inefficiency. The fact that these things are difficult is how you learn important albeit maybe expensive lessons and become an expert and a leader. To paraphrase JFK, we have to do these things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Only a fool would think learning is a waste of time.