• 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Its almost like the reason to secede would be completely different in 2025 than in the 1860s. Are you suggesting that the 2025 secession would end badly? And for which side is it going to end badly for?

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 days ago

        There’s no law left.

        The constitution has been terminated, as per Frumps statements and actions.

        Besides, can’t commit a crime if you’re defending your country. Straight from the horses ass. He didn’t say which country.

      • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean, to secede would eliminate a lot of laws that you previously had to follow, but once seceded, don’t apply to you anymore (at least in the eyes of the state).