I am really not getting what is so hard to understand about what I said or why people in this thread really want to fight about it but I guess I’ll say it again;
I can see why people are pissed about how she goes about spreading an otherwise good message and I am willing to listen to them. I am not arguing either side.
Of course I refuse. Why would I engage with people who don’t get that I was responding to someone who was discounting others’ opinions because they disagree with them and then everyone did that to me?
I can understand what you’re saying, but one side is irredeemably evil and the other wants the evil to stop. Equivocating between the two is support for the former.
I dont feel like you are reading what I am saying. I can see both sides. I’m not arguing for either one.
You claim that you “feel there is an argument to be had that the way she goes about doing things can do more harm than good and border on immature.”
I’m asking for what the evidence supporting immaturity would be in that argument.
I am really not getting what is so hard to understand about what I said or why people in this thread really want to fight about it but I guess I’ll say it again;
I can see why people are pissed about how she goes about spreading an otherwise good message and I am willing to listen to them. I am not arguing either side.
And people are simply asking you to provide an example of why people might be pissed. Since you said you understand why.
You refuse to do it.
Of course I refuse. Why would I engage with people who don’t get that I was responding to someone who was discounting others’ opinions because they disagree with them and then everyone did that to me?
Sure. You’re just badmouthing one side and not the other.
I can understand what you’re saying, but one side is irredeemably evil and the other wants the evil to stop. Equivocating between the two is support for the former.