• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Cell phones are basically required in 2025 and this site is hyping a $2000 one that lasts a whole 6 hours?

    • d3lta19@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I guess you didn’t read the article. They mentioned multiple times in the article that it sells for $500. At that price, they recommend it.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        Used. It also says new is $2K. Who didn’t read the article again?

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          You, who overlooked that fact that they specifically did not recommend it at that price.

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s still a $2K phone new. Even a $100 phone is expected to get more than 6 hours. At least make a halfass attempt to see the point.

            • AmbiguousProps
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              This article isn’t about that, so clearly you did not read the article.

              • Turret3857@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                im gonna be real didnt read it either but I wouldnt have gone this far to defend something so silly, saying that "but is $2k!