US Senator Lindsay Graham has just tweeted an article titled “Greta Thunberg sets sail with Gaza flotilla that aims to break Israeli naval blockade,” adding the comment, “Hope Greta and her friends can swim!”
Australian Zionist think tanker Arsen Ostrovsky somehow outdid Graham, tweeting “Oh look, the little jihadi Greta Thunberg is trying to get into Gaza, to show solidarity with Hamas. It would be so sad if something were to happen to her flotilla…”
There’s not a lot that can shock me about Israel and its supporters these days. But if you’d traveled back in time a few years ago it would be hard to explain to someone how we got to a timeline that includes Israel supporters openly advocating the assassination of Greta Thunberg.
Not to sure myself, but considering how many zionists are calling her out for supposedly not caring about climate change anymore (because people can’t support more than one cause
) I have a feeling she either wasn’t as vocal about her support or it just wasn’t amplified as much as it is now after Oct.7th.
Actually Israelis are massively destroying the local ecosphere with their genocide. And its also not very good on the global climate as well.
So yes she actually does act in a very consistent with her OG climate activism. They will just say anything to distract.
Not really, she supported Ukraine who comitted at least 2 ecocides (3 if we believe offical versions) and attempted to do more in two different nuclear plants few times. Also she took part in the colour coup attemt in Georgia recently, which could potentially destabilise entire Caucasian region and plunge it into war yet again.
All due respect for actually placing herself at the target spot for Israel murderers, but she’s at the “antiwar-ism” place of the known Chinese meme and it’s evidently more important to her than the ecological consistency.
I mean supporting Banderkraine is probably one thing they would like her for, but it’s only mean they aren’t consistent too, so sure. We shouldn’t just give uncritical suport where it isn’t due.
Her politics is largely the same as some Western radlib, but I’ll give her credit for her bravery. I don’t think the Zionist entity will kill her if they’re being rational, but then again, a substantial portion of the Zionist entity believe bioengineering a red heifer will bring about the Messiah, so who knows.
Removed by mod
If Iran or Egypt invaded Israel you would 100% be crying about “heroic antifascist Netanyahu”.
Post hog
Lol no.
So, no actual argument?
Why don’t you give one first instead of shitty marvel-ass one liners
The Ukranian goverment renames streets after Nazis, and elevates neo nazis groups like Azov to official status
Russia also sucks but you don’t see their soldiers regularly give the ‘roman salute’ and carrying the flags of WWII nazi collaborators like the UPA
Citation needed
https://www.timesofisrael.com/kiev-renames-major-street-to-honor-russian-nazi-collaborator/
https://defendinghistory.com/ukrainian-city-naming-street-in-honor-of-waffen-ss-hauptsturmfuhrer/90373
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/u-s-lifts-ban-on-providing-weapons-and-training-for-ukraines-controversial-azov-brigade
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-far-right-vigilantes-destroy-another-romany-camp-in-kyiv/29280336.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_Insurgent_Army
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_Ukrainian_Insurgent_Army
None of that is ok but it certainly doesn’t justify invading a country in order to genocide it and annex it’s territory.
citation needed
Ukraine isnt defending themselves against the yanks at all
Russia is a fascist dictatorship that is invading Ukraine.
NATO is a fascist dictatorship that has completed a coup in Ukraine (and many other places) and had been trying to further subjugate Russia as a colony via Ukraine as its proxy.
“NATO is a fascist dictatorship”
Citation needed. It’s not even a state. It’s an alliance.
“that has completed a coup in Ukraine”
A popular revolution that overthrew a dictatorship is not a “coup”
“and had been trying to further subjugate Russia as a colony via Ukraine as its proxy”
Citation needed
Colour revolution.
There’s a not ideal number of nazi NATO generals
Lol go back to reddit clown
If invading Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Vietnam, Korea and many other places, carrying out genocides - including the one in Palestine, - maintaining colonialism, literally installing fascists into power in places such as Chile and Ukraine isn’t fascist, then nothing is.
Notably, you did not provide any citations that support your claim of Russia being fascist.
Lol. ‘Dictatorship’. That word doesn’t mean anything.
Also, we literally know that NATO organized it. Nuland was even picking whom to put into government positions wrote a while before the competing of the coup.
Cute.
Notably, you didn’t provide any citations for your fantasy of Russia doing this for reasons that boil down to the racist ‘asiatic hordes’ stuff. But hey, have you really not heard of such things as ‘economics’ and ‘colonialism’, and have you never paid attention to the last few centuries of history?
Usa is a fascist shithole that is invading ukraine
When did the USA invade Ukraine?
Ukraine is a fascist country, Russia is trying to fix that.
You swallowed Russian propaganda.
You swallowed deez nuts lmao
Just because it’s propaganda doesn’t mean it’s incorrect, just because Russia is bad doesn’t mean Ukraine is good
Ukraine doesn’t need to be “good” to be the agreeved party.
Neither does Russia, you’re willing to recognize the nuance for one and not the other because you don’t actually give a shit about nuance at all you’re just looking for any justification you can find to simp for the US state dept
Ukrainians have a right to self determination.
If the US backs a regime they’re bad news, no exceptions.
The ‘self-determination’ to drop bridges on passenger trains and to participate in invasions into Iraq and Syria.
NATO should have stayed the fuck away from Ukraine and not try to incorporate them into their alliance. If you don’t understand how NATO establishing military bases on Russia’s borders threatens their security you need to shut the fuck up about global politics until you educate yourself on such matters
So Russia is entitled to control Ukraine?
Who cares what Russia is “entitled” to? What matters is that placing hostile military bases on a long, geographically soft border is obviously going to be perceived by them as a threat to their national security, and so they acted to prevent that from becoming a reality. It is not about some moralist stance, but the simple realistic calculation that an encroaching enemy military alliance will be responded to if deemed necessary and possible.
So you accept that Russia is in the wrong in invading Ukraine?
Yes, but geopolitics is not about simple moralistic judgements. What matters is that US and NATO did everything they possibly could to provoke that reaction in order to a) damage Russia and b) seize control of Ukraine’s assets. The US wanted Russia to invade Ukraine. It wants the war to continue indefinitely, no matter how many Ukrainians are killed. The US’s objective is not a free, democratic, independent Ukraine, but a subservient, reactionary, militarized neocolony whose resources and labor are siphoned up by US capitalists. Arming Ukraine does nothing to protect the Ukrainian people - it prolongs their suffering with no real chance of liberation, because even if they win they will fall under the US’s absolute control.
Is America entitled to nuke russia?
No.
Answer my original question.
No.
Is Ukraine allowed to genocide ethnic minorities in their border with impunity?
So, NATO is entitled to control Ukraine and Russia?
No. But any country is free to join NATO willingly, even if it pisses off Russia.
Why do you people like to bring up the fact that states can willingly join what is the contemporary nazi Axis as a good thing that should not be fought against?
At this point Ukraine would be better off reuniting with Russia rather than become a puppet state for NATO
Mask off.
Oh yeah, they’d be much better off paying tribute to the countries that continue to pressure them to wage a proxy war on their behalf instead of surrendering and putting an end to the bloodshed.