• ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    If a person gets an excuse (diagnose) then isn’t it more likely they will just stop reading - and teachers won’t be able to force them to read, thus making the kids stuck with the lack of skill? It’s how you’ll get even higher practical illiteracy rates.

    Testing kids and grading their reading skills is fine, but dyslexia is massively overdiagnosed. To be honest it might make sense to drop any special treatment for “dyslexic” kids.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The intention here is that diagnosing people earlier will help dyslexic children learn different strategies for reading and that will help them read more, which seems to be supported by research.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        My point is that dyslexia rate is much lower than 15-20% (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8183124/) and different strategies for dyslexic people might not be a) suitable and b) necessary for vast majority of misdiagnosed kids.

        They are also very costly.

        I’m all for grading kids skills, but I don’t see how with the current misdiagnosis trend this will end well.

        If you have hope that yes, it will be better that way, let’s try it. I just don’t trust the quality solution (like Structured Literacy or OG) wil be deliverwd.