• adelaide@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Referencing the Dunning-Kruger effect in casual contexts. Most people who refer to it, have not really read about it enough to be qualified to use it.

    • bob@lemmy.havocperil.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, you can sum it up in a sentence. Is it really that complex?

      “People with poor knowledge, experience or skill in an area tend to overestimate their ability in that area.”

      Is your beef that people tend to conflate lack of skill or knowledge with low intelligence, which is not what the DK effect says?

      • adelaide@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your summary is correct. However, most people use the Dunning-Kruger effect to describe individuals with low intelligence as arrogant. Another issue is that most people as soon as they learn about the effect think that they’ve become immune to it.

        • towerful@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          All it does for me is double down the imposter-syndrome.
          I’m not good at this… People keep hiring me, maybe I’m alright at it. Dunning-Kuger is a thing, maybe my “people keep hiring me” ego is making me blind.
          And yet, every day I do cool things, I learn new cool things, I redo old things with my new knowledge
          But still… I’m just pretending

    • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh its a meme at this point. Everyone knows to what you’re referring and recognises the shared experience of overconfident stupid people. Everyone educated on the topic understands that it’s a pop psychological misrepresentation of some very interesting work.

      I wouldn’t say it shows a lack of education. If anything it’s more prevalent in populations that have had an excess of a certain type of unhelpful “executive” education.

      • adelaide@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone educated on the topic understands that it’s a pop psychological misrepresentation of some very interesting work.

        The irony of this is that those who aren’t “educated on the topic” do not realize that by describing the Dunning-Kruger effect as the law of “overconfident stupid people”, they themselves have become subjects of the effect.

        What I was trying to say is that the Dunning-Kruger effect being misrepresented as something that only applies to “stupid people” is often done by people who are themselves undereducated on its topic. The DK effect applies to everybody.