• Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tell that to my father-in-law who came hours away from dying, and myself who had blood counts so low, they thought I was dying from cancer.

    The current strain may not be as deadly, but the next version could absolutely be worse. This removes the ability protect against those changes in the future.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          My point is that the Trump administration’s position on covid and influenza vaccines isn’t any different from the Danish position.

          Unless you have some underlying health problem, you aren’t at risk. (Although I suspect this assumes previous exposure or vaccination).

          • Gerudo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I think you’re missing my point. My father-in-law and myself are far from high risk, yet he was hours from death in the hospital, and I was on my way there. Us being vaccinated likely saved our lives. If this policy was inacted back then, we would not have been given the vaccine, and likely both died.

            It doesn’t matter who’s policy it is, it’s a fucked up one to tell their citizens that you can’t take precautions to potentially save your own life.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Statistically you and your father in law are not at risk, but I see your point that the option to choose to have a booster should not be removed.