• cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It depends on your definition of “usually”, high end GPUs for data centers, AI, workstations or “enthusiasts” yea. For these applications you’re starting at like 16

    GPUs for us plebs, no

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s also fairly cheap to buy 32+ GB of RAM, lots of choices for under $80. Meanwhile, I’m not even sure how you find a video card with 32GB of VRAM (not that you really need this much, 12GB and 16GB are pretty solid for a video card nowadays).

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tbf, we should be starting with 16GB for gaming GPUs too, especially for those prices. But … NVidia.

      But yeah, modern HPC Processors have at least 48GB or so. And max. is the AMD Mi355X with 288GB VRAM afaik. Which is actually less than my servers RAM, ha! But also probably like a thousand times fasted, considering my RAM runs at 1600 MT/s.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m seeing games today regularly hitting 11 GB, and that’s without raytracing or frame generation which require more VRAM.

        The new 8GB GPU Nvidia just launched is a trap. It exists to trick people into buying a GPU that they’ll need to upgrade next year.