• otterpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Once it has been validated, what would you then say the source of the knowledge gained was?

      • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You just said it, the research validates the source where you learned the fact. In this case, it’s a video game lol. The medium doesn’t matter, only that the information is correct

          • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            You tell me obviously, but you just told otterpop that the research material used to validate the other stuff with would be the source.

            I don’t necessarily disagree with the original point, I’m just pointing this part out.

            • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Both is true though. If the fact in the video game was correct, it is how you learned about it, hence it is your source of knowledge. Also, the research material with which you confirmed the fact is a source of knowledge. And if that fact in the video game wasn’t true, then the research material is a source but not the video game.
              However, I wouldn’t list a video game as a source when I talk about historical facts but only as an initial spark of interest that led me to research said historical facts.