• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Upvote to the moon. Lots of leftists seem to intellectually understand that money is a fiction that’s sometimes useful, but are bad at putting that into practice.

    I’ll stick my neck out on something here: this includes donating to individual people in Gaza, even if they’re coming to you from a verified source on Blue Sky. Yes, a kilo of flour might cost $600. Giving someone $600 to buy flour might feed that family, but there’s some other family who isn’t getting that flour. You’re just choosing who starves today. The fundamental issue is that there isn’t enough flour or any other food. There is no way to solve that by donating to individuals. It can only be solved by telling the government of Israel to go fuck itself.

    • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It can only be solved by telling the government of Israel to go fuck itself.

      I wrote them a strongly worded email. Is it solved now?

      I get the general point you’re making. But you’re not even recommending the money be spent on something else that will help. We can do both things. If you are going to donate money because you have spare and want to help, and then don’t on the basis you’re choosing who starves, you’re still just making an additional family starve.

      I dunno. I haven’t thought too much about this. Convince me why it’s not better to try to enact change and donate money at the same time.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        “Tell Israel to go fuck itself” in a broad sense. Yes, donating money to a cause that directly tells Israel to go fuck itself, in something more than a strongly worded letter, is worthwhile.