• LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Idk if it’s misogyny exactly, I’m not sure what to call it but I don’t think it’s misogyny. Just because she likes to see the giggle doesn’t mean she thinks any less of the other women, she could even hold her in very high regard. Objectification, sure, but not misogyny me thinks.

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just because she likes to see the giggle doesn’t mean she thinks any less of the other women, she could even hold her in very high regard.

      Misogyny aside, there’s nothing in this sentence that is gender-specific other than the pronouns. We should recognize it and call it out regardless.

    • kryptonite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not familiar with the source material, so I could be off base, but I didn’t read this as misogynistic or objectifying. It seems to me that the driver didn’t want to drive 4 hours each way to pick up the passenger, even if they’re friends, so she’s punishing the passenger with the bumpy road. Especially with a chest that big, all the jiggling is likely to hurt, or at best be very uncomfortable. I didn’t read this as the driver having prurient motives, but to be fair, I’m not attracted to breasts. ::shrug::

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wait…you’re not attracted to breasts? I think you may be the only one. Even gay men, and straight women love breasts.

        My brain does not comprehend your existence.