You are a hero

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    So the website is super summy, finally found the “real” download button which took me to the MS app store. Ok fine, but now its been 10 minutes and it actually hasn’t started downloading yet…

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You don’t lose money when people use a competitors service/product over yours. That money wasn’t yours to lose.

    • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yet, the companies cry about losing money due to online piracy. At this point it’s eźtremally funny

      • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        for me, anyway, they didn’t lose money because if i couldn’t pirate it, I just wouldn’t watch. I’m told this is a common thought process

        • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          “If I couldn’t easily grab it off the table and walk away with it ,I wouldn’t have stolen it.”

          Screw the media companies for the price gouging and being general dicks dragging people through the courts, but it’s still knowingly working around and accessing content that someone else paid to create. I dunno why people can’t be honest “I did it because it was easy and the chances of being caught were nominal. The risk / reward was in my favour”.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 minutes ago

            Your gonna get down votes and people crying about how words can mean anything, but entirely true. Risk/reward is 99% of it. Its also socially acceptable to talk about owning pirated media, which reduces the risk.

          • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            it’s not theft if you can’t legally own it. They willingly change the TOS to say that you’re basically renting it, and they can take it away for any reason, at any time. If they can take away something I paid money for, it’s not wrong to pirate it.

            • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              That’s a different argument though. If you have paid for a license to the content and they remove the distribution method or kill the drm that allows access to it. I’d say it’s fair game that you find an “alternative” copy of the content or work around to keep access to what you paid for. Unless you are knowingly buying it on a 1 off rental basis.

              Don’t get me wrong, the current system is not weighted in the consumers favour at all and it’s a good reason to not play the game and avoid netflix, buy drm free computer games, etc but I just object to the argument the people who pirate are somehow noble robinhoods in a legally sound position. You’re still knowingly accessing something that someone paid to create and you’re gaining a benefit from that in entertainment. You’re just finding a way to justify doing so that sits right with your own moral code.

              If everyone pirated, the entertainment industry would cease to exist or at least be greatly reduced the remaining people would only be doing it as a hobby. Big budget moves and TV series, AAA computer games would no longer find funding if no one at the consumer end is paying for it.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                53 minutes ago

                You’re still knowingly accessing something that someone paid to create and you’re gaining a benefit from that in entertainment.

                And how do you feel about adblockers? By using one you’re depriving sites of the ad revenue they’d gain off of you reading their article or watching their video, etc. Do you use one or are you raw dogging the internet so that the content servers can harvest your data which they sell to serve you targeted ads?

              • ulterno@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 hour ago

                I feel like, in the long run, this is going to be a good thing.

                Hopefully:
                Consumers will realise the problems with streaming platforms and those who pirate will realise the importance of supporting the studios they like.
                Then there will be less people using the streaming services and more people buying copies directly from the studio.

                All that remains is studios using a service that P2Ps directly to the customer’s computer, bypassing all the wasted Blu-ray plastics.
                I am going to, once again, give the example of Steam game soundtracks, which I can keep wherever I want and listen to, using whichever software I want.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Not to mention, it’s not theft because the original is still intact.

              If I go steal a car, I’m taking the physical item and depriving the owner of said item.

              If I download a movie, the movie is still there, it has been copied at best, not “stolen.”

              It’s like watching a baseball game from the fence, sure you didn’t pay for the ticket, but you’re not occupying a seat so that someone else can’t pay to use it.

              If I download a movie, it doesn’t take it off netflix so nobody else can enjoy it.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not the gotcha you think it is. They said competitors, piracy makes them use your own product and not pay you for it.

        Would a kid buy photoshop if they had to? Probably not. Would a sketchy company? Yup.

            • Leon@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              I don’t see how it is. A kid that can’t afford to buy photoshop won’t buy it any more than a sketchy company would, just like how facebook much rather steal material than pay their way for it. The difference obviously being that the sketch company might very well have the capital to pay their way, they’re just used to get away with it.

              • ulterno@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 minute ago

                The point you are missing is the “had to”.

                The sketchy company didn’t have to pay the creators for it because it was available via different means.
                They would have had to, if they couldn’t find it otherwise.

                Of course, in that case, they would have “borrowed” it from libraries and such, but then again, the premise is that they had to, which is not being fulfilled in your example.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Inkscape is good but it can’t replace illustrator, especially for the needs of someone willing to pay $1000/year for it

    Maybe the affinity suite is more appropriate (ROI in just 2 months of adobe subscription)

  • iampivot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It seems just fitting that he wears a hat that you need bezier curves to draw perfectly with vector graphics!

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Lost dollars because of free software and lost dollars because of piracy are both imaginary numbers.

  • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Ive used both inskape and illustrator and inkscape is better and has been better ux wise since day 1 for me.

  • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    461
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I disagree with that framing, someone not buying your shit is not the same as you losing money. Inkscape saved millions for graphic designers, which is very different. Adobe was not entitled to that money, you can’t lose something that was never yours.

    • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      188
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Subtle distinction, but actually pretty huge. I agree with you. Companies also use this to say that pirating is stealing, when they never had the business in the first place.

      • gradual@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Yeah. If piracy wasn’t an option, I just wouldn’t play those games.

        So many games I have pirated that I have yet to play because there aren’t enough hours in the day and I don’t want to spend them all gaming.

        All the money you give these corporations will be used against you someday.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly. I’m pirating because I can’t afford to pay hundreds of dollars each month to watch all the movies and shows that I do. If I didn’t have the opportunity to pirate, I still wouldn’t afford it legitimately…

        • gradual@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          So close.

          You should be pirating even if you can afford it because pirating is a tool to help reduce the disparity in wealth.

        • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          It’s also a great way to demo games and other software if you can afford it before you waste money on something that has no value to you. This is especially useful when you’re on a tight budget.

            • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              And the 7-day free trian totally will not become a 2 year subscription which costs more to cancel than keep, and the price will not be 3x the sticker price had you just gotten to the “buy” option. We’re a legit business!

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You are right, of course, but I personally draw a great of pleasure from imaging the CEO of Adobe screaming, “CURSE YOU MARTIN OWENS!!!”

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I had exactly 0 intention of ever buying anything from Adobe.

      Inkscape gave me an alternative to the high seas. And it happens to do everything I need it to, although it’s way more powerful than the simple vector graphics conversions I use it for.

      10/10, Adobe never lost money from me getting Inkscape. They lost the game before they knew I was a player.

    • Photuris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I was prepared to scold you for being pedantic, but upon further reflection, I’ve concluded that you are 100% correct, and your point is germane to the conversation at hand, so you get an upvote instead.

        • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I worked for a company that made MIDI sequencers. Had been making them for decades before I got there, and still making them long after I left.

          One of the first products I worked on, the marketing team decided to put on the box, “World’s first ever MIDI sequencer” 😆

          We almost need a new series called, “Companies Say the Darndest Things” that picks up after the original. I’m sure a lot of the kids in the original show are running these companies now.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I agree. I would never have bought Adobe, I would have not the little bit of vector drawing I have done.

      I’m grateful for InkScape, but I wouldn’t have bought or downloaded anything otherwise, so I neither saved nor did Adobe lose.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Right, it’s akin to saying he stole that money from Adobe the same way the media companies imply that poor people making digital copies of music and movies they wouldn’t be able to afford otherwise is theft.

  • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I’m not a pro but do some shit from time to time. Between Inkscape and Gimp I never needed anything else for images. If only Gimp had better tools for animated gifs… still serviceable tho haven’t tried the new Gimp yet.