Stamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agoI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1658arrow-down113file-textcross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up1645arrow-down1imageI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square65linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squareTheButter_ItSeeps@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 days agoThey could each be on the vertices of a tetrahedron for all we know…
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoWe do know that, with those measurements, they aren’t confined to a single (Euclidean) plane.
minus-squareLovable Sidekick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 days agoExactly! I regret that I have but one upvote to give.
minus-squareMistic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoI was thinking of plane surfaces, but if their altitudes are different, I guess it’d be possible.
Wdym?
They could each be on the vertices of a tetrahedron for all we know…
We do know that, with those measurements, they aren’t confined to a single (Euclidean) plane.
Exactly! I regret that I have but one upvote to give.
I was thinking of plane surfaces, but if their altitudes are different, I guess it’d be possible.