Lemmy Today
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
finitebanjo@lemmy.world to Shirts That Go Hard@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago

I thought my shirt made it very clear!

lemm.ee

message-square
20
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
243

I thought my shirt made it very clear!

lemm.ee

finitebanjo@lemmy.world to Shirts That Go Hard@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago
message-square
20
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
  • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think in this context we should be evaluating the shirt in its situation irregardless of the character wearing it.

    If Potus 45 wore an anime decaled jacket with the words Contraceptive on the back then it would slap regardless of that orangutan’s influence.

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      irregardless

      What a horrible word

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bewildering. Unconscionable. Incorrigible perhaps.

        • Lena@gregtech.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Bamboozling and unfathomable, so to speak

        • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Marvelous

          https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vmcdn.ca%2Ff%2Ffiles%2Ftricitynews%2Fimages%2Farts%2Ftyler3.jpg%3Bw%3D960%3Bh%3D640%3Bbgcolor%3D000000&f=1&ipt=2c1943302fe9bc7ae26b12146110c187a9993f37731504ec2951ee708dc9b32a

      • don@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seems like it should mean “without regardlessness” or “having no regardlessness”, which is a bit of a complicated way of saying “with regard”. Synonymous with “unregardless”.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          What it should mean is something you should take up with those who write dictionaries.

        • Lena@gregtech.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think @finitebanjo@lemmy.world meant it as a “synonym” (it’s not) to regardless

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re both incorrect, sorry to say. Try a dictionary out some time.

Shirts That Go Hard@lemmy.world

shirtsthatgohard@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !shirtsthatgohard@lemmy.world

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2

Community Rules

No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content

Also, follow the Terms of Service/rules of Lemmy.World.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.12K users / day
  • 1.32K users / week
  • 2.57K users / month
  • 7.11K users / 6 months
  • 34 local subscribers
  • 4.63K subscribers
  • 294 Posts
  • 3.29K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • TehBamski@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org