You couldn’t make this shit up.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right he was using resources to improve the DNC and make sure the ones that HAVE BEEN FAILING to maybe get primaried. Maybe answer for their mistakes. I don’t know these are all things that the DNC need to do to improve. Unless better representation isn’t the point. 🤔

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, that’s right. I’m 100% behind him. That wasn’t criticism, it was clarification. He didn’t suggest not running incumbents. That’s not a choice the DNC can make.

    • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Those are just made up rules you’re enforcing. They’re not grounded in logic or reason in any way.

      And it’s cost us two absolutely fucking devastating losses, the last of which has ended American Democracy as we know it and given rise to a dictatorship in the longest running democracy on earth (previously).

      So maybe, just maybe, those rules are bullshit, and the people like you trying to virtue signal need to pick a fucking lane here and decide if you want to fight fascism, or just virtue signal your way into a concentration camp.

      Edit: I mischaracterized the poster above me here, they were just relaying information, I’ve apologized further below. :) Keeping my comment up for context, but I was wrong to attack OP the way I did.

    • ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      Incumbents always stay on the ballot unless they choose not to run.

      Hmm, well that’s stupid.