• PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I mean isn’t it accepted that NixOS is a terrible pick for a beginner, especially a non-technical one? I feel like even the Nix community doesn’t recommend the distro to complete beginners.

    • TheFANUM @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I wish. People recommend Arch to beginners all the time. And then wonder why there’s so many “Linux is too hard” comments everywhere

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I use Nixos BTW.

      And I can’t recommend it to anyone. Not even veterans.

      I can only say if you like souls like games nixos might be your thing…

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I really wish everyone thought like that, but I still see people recommending Nix, Arch, Void… and some go the ideological route and start recommending systemd-less only like Artix or ranting against anything that uses Flatpak. Those discussions can get messy, and they always alienate the person who asked. Unfortunately those with ideological reasons are always the loudest and present in basically every “Beginner’s Help” group.

      • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I wouldn’t recommend vanilla Arch only because of the installation process. CachyOS that simplifies it is an extremely good pick for a person who already knows what a computer is, but wants to try a proper OS.

        Arch mostly got it’s reputation in the early days. Today some things are a lot easier to do on Arch than on other distros, especially because AUR exists. Also, it built one of the best wikis over all that time.