• lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Some time ago, I read an analysis on why left-wing parties were allegedly more successful in Scandinavia than other parts of Europe. It claimed that, for all their pro-social domestic policy, they weren’t as immigrant-friendly as many other left-wing parties. Supposedly, that approach helped undermined the narrative that “I have nothing, yet these immigrants come here to get stuff for free at my expense.” By putting their own country’s needs first, they won over voters that worried they were being screwed over.

    I have no way to verify how accurate that analysis was, nor do I have any sense of how dated it might be, so I’ll be sceptical, but the idea stuck with me. I can’t really blame people for putting their own needs first, and I wonder how much that influences the popularity of right-wing parties all around.

    Of course, health care should be a universal good anyway and the US system definitely needs fixing, but I can understand how the “freeloader immigrant” propaganda would work on people suffering from that system – misery breeds bigotry and all.

  • Emergency3030@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    California depends on federal money and I bet the orange 🍊 man in the white house behind the scenes is pushing Newsom to be tough on immigrants or risk losing federal grants for California.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s insane to think “only some fascism” is a viable electoral platform. The “all the fascism” minority won’t support you and the “no fascism” majority will stay home again.

    Newsom is just another short sighted coward happy to watch the poors suffer as long as his seat is comfortable.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s insane to think “only some fascism” is a viable electoral platform. The “all the fascism” minority won’t support you and the “no fascism” majority will stay home again.

      That was basically 2024’s two major candidates. Full fascism and murder, some fascism and slightly less murder.

      Fascists won’t compromise on 40% evil, because they only want 100% fascism. Trump secured their vote. The most evil member who has his own cultists, not a big shock that evil people like evil.

      People with a conscience saw that a candidate was willing to compromise on letting trans people get hurt, neutral on an active genocide in Gaza, didn’t care about Mexicans in cages, wasn’t budging on helping working class families, or trying to roll back Trump’s changes from 2016 that didn’t get rolled back over 10 years of “fighting against Trump”.

      So it was 100% evil, or 40% evil. One is better but neither is good.

    • ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      California Uber Alles Where are the Dead Kennedys when you need them? Sometimes I feel like I am the only punk who made it throught he 80s.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Presumably his advisors determined that he needed to Overton more and faster if he wanted to ensure that he’d be the neolib weasel the DNC shoves down our throats in 2028.

  • ifeelsick@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Heard somebody else describe it as he might be getting ready to run as a candidate for the next presidential election.

    I could see him as trying to appeal to red states by trashing on immigrants. its been proven to be effective with the current administration and I can most definitely see him using that momentum to get his shoe in with some voters.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Democrats learned from their mistake in 2008, allowing a younger person to enter the race and not tip the scales. They made sure to never let anything unplanned happen ever again. As long as I have been able to vote, I haven’t had a fair primary for the party that is closest to my views on the nation level.

          Republicans didn’t really expect Trump, and they liked that he drove in viewers with his batshit insane rants about Mexico. He brought in viewers and water cooler talk about “Did you see him talk about his dick at the debates?” The RNC rolled with the punches of Trump’s lunacy.

          Doesn’t help the media gravitated to him, giving him free press coverage. No such thing as bad news for fascists, after all. And while the media gave free attention to Trump, they somehow never covered Bernie when he was winning states and popularity votes, especially when he was more likely to defeat Trump in a 1v1.

          Just… “funny” how the media focused on fascism and ignored the person who wanted to make fascism unviable.

  • anon6789@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Someone better check on this guy, he seems to have had the same type of stroke that Fetterman had.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah he was always an opportunist who lacked any real convictions. Californians knew this already but now the national public is learning of it.

      • anon6789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s disappointing. I’m really hoping this isn’t the next presidential candidate we’re going to get.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There’s never going to be a president that liberates us. The office itself is tyrannical in nature.

          We will need to liberate ourselves.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Man that was a bad look for him. I was 100% for the lockdown to help slow COVID. But it was just emblematic of the issues people had with him.

          He told everyone to be locked down and stay tight. He got to stay having parties with his friends in his wine houses in Napa Valley, which somehow got lighter restrictions for COVID policies and punishments for disobeying them.

          Jimmy Carter had his issues in the office, but he practiced what he preached. When he wanted America to stop spending so much gas during the various crisis, he had the white house turn down its gas he wore swears, publicly and privately.