The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Because they have proven they aren’t interested in meaningfully improving things…

    I want an option besides collapse and slow collapse lol

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I agree. We need time to build a leftist party or to fundamentally change the Democratic party. I’m not opposed to completely rewiring the Republican party if it’s a faster option.

      We can get more time by voting for the least fascist option. That way we won’t be sent off El Salvador while we’re trying to fix things.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I think the brands are too toxic at this point.

        Like 70% of people say they want more third parties that actually care about the things they do and don’t like the Duopoly.

        • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, I agree. I think first past the post has not been good. That’s what forces us into this two-party system.

          I would vote for a third party if it became more popular than the Democrats or the Republicans, and it was progressive/ leftist.

          The problem is getting it over that hump.