The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m speaking of a socialist revolution. Not a fascist takeover.

    I don’t care what they want to call it. “Revolutions” serve people. Not demagogues.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I’m speaking of a socialist revolution. Not a fascist takeover.

      So a Communist takeover. Not much difference in that and a fascist takeover.

      “Revolutions” serve people.

      Then how come the Russian revolution and the Iranian revolution and the Chinese revolution all killed millions of people much of whom were selected randomly? Why would an unaccountable government that doesn’t allow people to chose their own leaders be more likely rather than far less likely to “serve people”