A popular narrative suggests young people are liberal and getting more liberal. Thus, social media buzzed when a chart surfaced in spring that seemed to suggest 12th-grade boys had become overwhelm…

While many believe young people are becoming more liberal, data shows that 12th grade boys are nearly twice as likely to identify as conservative compared to liberal. Around 25% of high school seniors identify as conservative while only 13% identify as liberal. In contrast, the share of 12th grade girls identifying as liberal has risen to 30%. Many factors may contribute to this trend, including the rhetoric of Donald Trump which appealed to disaffected young men, and the focus of progressive movements on issues of gender and racial equality which some young men perceive as a “matriarchy.” However, most high school seniors claim no political identity, and many boys in high school do not actively discuss

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    0·
    1 year ago

    I was a card carrying Libertarian after high school, before my sense of empathy developed more fully.

    • Titan@beehaw.org
      0·
      1 year ago

      Same. The world seemed so simple back then, until I matured. I suspect a lot of people are emotionally stuck

      • UncleClerk@aussie.zone
        1·
        1 year ago

        I can also relate, a classic libertarian utopia sounds great until you realise poor people exist. I think a lot of individuals are just afraid of personal growth because it often means admitting you were wrong.

        • jcarax@beehaw.org
          0·
          1 year ago

          Well, it’s not something you just institute overnight. Just like with communism, if you try that you’d end up with a pretty big mess, because people will manipulate the framework for their own personal gains. Instead it’s something you work towards slowly, through education and efforts to balance the system until it’s not really needed anymore.

          The keys always have to be:

          1. People legitimately caring about their neighbors, and supporting each other through good times and bad
          2. People working towards progress for the sake of progress and their community, not for personal gain

          Our actions weave into the fabric of society, and future generations are formed from that same fabric. It takes time to shift how our nature manifests into actual behavior.

    • Roundcat@kbin.social
      0·
      1 year ago

      In many ways I still consider myself libertarian, but moreso in anti authority leaning than Republican but with a cooler label. Many of my peers in highschool and university clicked with the pro guns, pro expression sentiment, but when it came actually letting queer people and religious minorities live their lives, or allowing women control over their own bodies and healthcare, they always seemed to side with the Authoritarians in power threatening the to restrict these people. Not to mention many of them had no problem with authority as long as it came from a corporate entity or oligarch.

      I still identify with the term Libertarian, but have stopped using it because it truly doesn’t represent what it was supposed to mean anymore.

      • lackthought@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        yeah it’s a shame that libertarian basically means closeted republican these days

        is there a better term?

        I’d consider myself pretty libertarian-minded in the whole ‘you live your life and I live mine’ style, but not in the ‘let corporations do whatever they want to workers and the environment’ style

        • Roundcat@kbin.social
          0·
          1 year ago

          I often go with Anti-Authoritarian when describing my beliefs. I’ve played around with the Anarchist label as well, though it seems to have the same affect on Communists who want an edgier label (which is ironic, considering both groups have clashed with each other throughout history)

          • TheForkOfDamocles@beehaw.org
            0·
            1 year ago

            I like many concepts of Anarchy, but until we have Star Trek levels of free unlimited power and food, I don’t think it would work.

            • The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org
              0·
              1 year ago

              There have been examples of anarchy working. Unfortunately, most of the ones I know of were around during World War 2 and got crushed between 2 larger opponents, or backstabbed by one of them.

              • Anarchists - and other socialists in Catalonia - during the Spanish Civil War, were stuck between the fascists and the republicans (Soviets), sided with the Soviets and ended up being betrayed. Homage to Catalonia by Orwell is a good book about the civil war and the anarchists.

              • Korean People’s Association in Manchuria were destroyed by Japan a few years before WW2 during a war between China and Japan IIRC, and apparently some of its leaders were also killed by “Korean communists” (the same ones that ended up forming North Korea).

              • The Black Army of Ukraine fought the Red and White armies at separate times; one time they joined the Red Army against the White Army, and were betrayed.

              You might have noticed a pattern there, which is also why a lot of anarchists are not found of Marxist-Leninists or Stalinists.