Because all the conversation I’ve seen has been against Trans Women going to women’s restrooms. Which is strange to me because, according to the twisted concept of TERFs, Trans men are not men (even though they are), but “women”.

Aren’t they worried about “women” going into men’s bathrooms?

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nope. Because it’s about policing women and the appearance of women and the gender norms of women while pretending to be so very very concerned about the safety of women.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Ding ding ding. It’s just another form of the “won’t someone think of the children” fear mongering that gets used to restrict freedoms.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Look, we need to protect the sanctity of women’s sports, while paying them about 1% of whatever ludicrous amount men get, so they can play at empty stadiums.

      • But the best time for a womens soccer game is 11am on a Wednesday! I am sure everyone interested enough will take the day off to go watch and if the stadium is empty, thats because womes sports are uninteresting and the men play better.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I’m normally against gatekeeping but I fully support demanding people “concerned about the sanctity of women’s sport” actually name three women’s sports teams.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Then double down to challenge them for three trans athletes on women’s sport teams. Anywhere