• Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If “AI art is kinda bad” is part of the argument against AI art, it will only be used against us when AI art isn’t that bad anymore.

    • Poxlox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like that it’s the same. If it were shitty, that’d kinda take away from the point- that we care about how a thing is made even if it’s the same result

      • brrt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think you’re overestimating the number of people who care about how the things they enjoy came to be. Clothes made by sweatshop workers, animal product industry, AI Art… it doesn’t matter.

        • Poxlox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Here on Lemmy I like to think there’s a good share who do. We all can make presumptuous conjecture about humans but a good chunk would at least prefer not to be shitty- whatever their definition may be…

          • brrt@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Oh for sure, most humans definitely have the potential to be good given the right circumstances. I just think we live in circumstances that will lead to AI replacing human artists and most people will not care. I’m not saying those humans are at fault though.

    • doug
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I counted the petals expecting there to be sans one.