Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywaydiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square115linkfedilinkarrow-up1491arrow-down121file-text
arrow-up1470arrow-down1imageWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywaydiscuss.tchncs.deNatanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square115linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-24 hours ago They’re an old spec from 2002 They’re useful, “old” is no excuse. Mobile OS have something similiar. No, don’t create a new spec, you’re bad at that kind of thing. They’re too small to click for people with increased accessibility needs Make them bigger? I can do that on XFCE. They serve the needs of app publishers (making their app visible at all times), not those of the user There are too many of them Again, they are useful to the user. Just give the user a way to control which to display or not. They look bad Your design team sucks And that’s why i don’t like Gnome (and Gtk for that matter); they prioritize their skewed visions over everything else, including usability.
They’re useful, “old” is no excuse. Mobile OS have something similiar. No, don’t create a new spec, you’re bad at that kind of thing.
Make them bigger? I can do that on XFCE.
Again, they are useful to the user. Just give the user a way to control which to display or not.
Your design team sucks
And that’s why i don’t like Gnome (and Gtk for that matter); they prioritize their skewed visions over everything else, including usability.