Elon Musk: It Is āOutrageousā to āClaim That Iām a Naziā << It is shallow. This is not 1937 Germany. Elon Musk is an Egomaniac - call him out for his egomania / egoism. Call him out for greed for power and control. Call him out for being manipulative
Call him out for manipulating āMind Virusā in the population using Twitter. For ābeing manipulativeā, for mind-fucking people like Rupert Murdoch does. Call him out for mass dehumanization using xAI / Grok / Twitter computing machines like Rupert Murdoch does with HDTV machines
His behaviour didnāt/doesnāt come across as someone who is trying not to look like a nazi. Even if the only reason he did it was to try and bait people to call him out on it so that it ālooks likeā we would call anyone a nazi for a āsimple misunderstandingā. He did way too good of a job making it look like a seig heil. Like he either was already practiced at it, or spent hours practicing it.
And itās not all we have to go onā¦ he was behaving and talking like a nazi long before making the āconfusingā gesture.
And it clearly didnāt go the way he thought it would. He thought with spin they would be able to make it a net positive, more support from like-minded people while being able to deflect their detractors for "godwin"ing them.
Yes, heās lost his heart and mind to Kremlinās 5,000 alternate reality screen games deployed on Twitter since March 2013. He shows the same pattern over pandemic response.
Citation, Johns Hopkins University / George Washington University: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45294192
Itās compulsive behavior. He purchased Twitter in 2022 because he saw that was how to get the population to follow him, same with Donald Trump. But he doesnāt realize he is mimicking Russia Kremlin media techniques of year 2013.
āIn the twenty-first century the techniques of the political technologists have become centralized and systematized, coordinated out of the office of the presidential administration, where Surkov would sit behind a desk on which were phones bearing the names of all the āindependentā party leaders, calling and directing them at any moment, day or night. The brilliance of this new type of authoritarianism is that instead of simply oppressing opposition, as had been the case with twentieth-century strains, it climbs inside all ideologies and movements, exploiting and rendering them absurd. One moment Surkov would fund civic forums and human rights NGOs, the next he would quietly support nationalist movements that accuse the NGOs of being tools of the West. With a flourish he sponsored lavish arts festivals for the most provocative modern artists in Moscow, then supported Orthodox fundamentalists, dressed all in black and carrying crosses, who in turn attacked the modern art exhibitions. The Kremlinās idea is to own all forms of political discourse, to not let any independent movements develop outside of its walls. Its Moscow can feel like an oligarchy in the morning and a democracy in the afternoon, a monarchy for dinner and a totalitarian state by bedtime.ā ā Peter Pomerantsev, Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia, year 2014
Ā
The entire population is doing everything it can to avoid studying information warfare / Cambridge Analytica manipulation side-effects.
he isnāt thinking, he is subconsciously manipulated, compulsively acting out, like the whole nation is doing. Mass psychosis.