• Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      For example this place: they have to rent this area in the center of the capital. That’s not cheap for them. There’s plenty of employees inside the restaurant.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        But if burger King wasn’t there, another restaurant would be in that place, paying that rent and salaries. There’s nothing unique about burger King that creates net new jobs. They didn’t build that building. Or anything for that matter. They don’t have some kind of unique technology or product. They don’t enable any new processes or offer new capabilities to anyone. If that place was owned by “aunt Marie Burgers and Frites” it would be a net positive for the area and the country.

        • Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Money coming inside of Belgium is a good thing. It funds development. This building has a renter. Aunt Marie burgers and frites’ money is being used elsewhere in the country for other development.

          The pie got larger.

          China became relevant because of foreign capital. Nothing else.

          We should motivate foreigners to pour their capital into Europe.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            There is no capital moving in. It’s not a new factory. It’s not a new technology. It’s not a novel product that didn’t exist before. They don’t even export anything. They pay the rent with money from their customers, just like anyone paying taxes in Belgium would. There is only capital moving out.

            • Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              So from a bit of research. The place is owned by Carl Goris. Someone living in Brussels. 99,5% of burger Kings worldwide are owned by franchisees.

              So about 6 to 10% of the revenue goes to USA.

              It’s up to you to decide if you think boycotting 90 to 94% local revenue to hinder 6 to 10% USA revenue is worth it.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s not boycotting local revenue. It’s going to the kebab place or pizzeria that leaves 100% of their revenue in Europe.

                • Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Aight you’re right, in this case there’s no capital inflow. Franchisees will stop using American branding if it doesn’t bring them customers