• stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    This standard would have probably caught on if they wouldn’t have gone and made it backwards.

    Objectively you are more likely to need to know the day first, then the month then the year, and when people get lazy they always just leave off the year because it is assumed, but if the year is first you have to say the whole thing or sound stupid.

    • Kamsaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends on the purpose. For documents (especially those on which people work collaboratively over long periods of time) I find YYYY-MM-DD ideal. It spares the issues around day or month first when Europeans and people from the US work together, the document are easy to sort and, if it takes more than a year to complete the project (as is often the case in research) things don’t get messy.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Run a business? Infuriate and baffle your accountants by insisting to do all business and keep all records according to a lunar calendar.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      In daily speech you’re correct, but the ISO standard isn’t meant for daily speech. It’s meant for timestamps and archives that can be queried in a systematic manner. In that case, the natural ordering is to narrow down the search by year-month-day.