• idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The white man’s burden is also used referentially to call out people who do things like travel to poor countries to build houses even though they have far less building experience than locals and the money they paid to get there would have gone much further, had it simply been donated in the form of building materials.

    I don’t know how RFK Jr. is using it, but it almost certainly makes no sense.

    Edit: oh, voluntourism! I knew there was a term for it

    • meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      No, you don’t get it! The benefit is not in the houses and wells that we must show those savages how to build. The blessing is the chance to spend time with their white saviors.

    • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Ah yes, that makes sense. I pointed out this problem when I was a church kid on a mission trip to build shitty houses. I was told “it’s ok, it’s not really about the money spent now on flying you all here and feeding and housing you for two weeks, it’s that people who went on missions as teens are 500% more likely to donate to missions later.” It was the beginning of the end for me in the religious world.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honestly, good for you for realizing young. I was around 20 when a coworker got annoyed about a company that sends a pair of shoes to people in need for every pair purchased and a lightbulb went off in my head.