• Krono
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Asking for a democratically elected leader to respond to the needs of the people isn’t “curing cancer and buying puppies”

    And yes Biden is better than Trump, but is that really how low you want to set the bar?

    Have some standards, mate.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the bar is already set that low because you wouldn’t need to choose between two geriatrics if the bar was higher. America could do better, but America won’t do better

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Expecting a president to make massive social changes when the House is led by a dysfunctional opposition party is asking for a cure to cancer and buying puppies. It’s just not going to happen.

      The candidates are Trump and Biden. That’s who we’ve got to pick from. Anyone else who thinks they have a chance is delusional. That’s the system. We can wish all we want it wasn’t so, but it is.

      The only way things begin to change is if the GOP loses control of the House, we get rid of the electoral college, and we get ranked choice voting. The only way that happens is through Democrats.

      • Krono
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dont expect Biden to get anything through the Republican house. I dont expect miracles. It’s too late now.

        I expected him to do something when Democrats had control of Congress. Instead he choose to follow Obama’s failures and do practically nothing when the people gave Democrats control of the House, Senate, and White House.

        And if you think Democrats will actually give up their role as Lesser Evil and pass ranked choice voting, then I think you are delusional.

        • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I expected him to do something when Democrats had control of Congress.

          You mean, when they had slim majorities and two quislings among the Democrats in the Senate who refused to vote for filibuster reform? That control?

          Please join us in reality. We’d love to have your help.

          • Krono
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe if the Democrats gave even a tiny amount of pushback against those “quislings” then they would deserve some credit.

            After all the damage Manchin has done, they still let him chair the energy committee and sit on appropriations. I’m here in reality wondering why they continue to give quislings so much power. Its almost as if the “rotating villain” is a feature, not a bug.

            “We tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas” isn’t good enough for me, and it’s sad that so many people just accept it.

            Have some standards, mate.

            • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe if the Democrats gave even a tiny amount of pushback against those “quislings” then they would deserve some credit.

              Like this?

              The problem was that both Manchin and Sinema understood that they had leverage to decide what policies lived or died. And as often as not, they torpedoed progressive legislation because they both consider themselves “moderate.” They didn’t stand in the way only when it didn’t interfere with their personal enrichment. And since Senate Democrats have no control over the elections that put them in that position, it’s extremely dishonest to blame Democrats for it.

              Now that Manchin is retiring, Democrats are shitting their pants over their chances to hold the Senate in 2024. They know they won’t be able to get a progressive to replace Manchin.

              • Krono
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, a few words to the media is not meaningful pushback.

                Why do you avoid my main argument? Manchin is head of the energy committee. Why do Democrats keep giving so much power to a quisling, even after they were betrayed by him?

                • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How do you punish him when he can simply start caucusing with Republicans and end the Democrats’ slim majority? In order to pressure him you have to have leverage, and for the past few years he’s had more of it than Senate Democrats.

                  • Krono
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’ll say it another time:

                    You pressure manchin by stripping him of his committee assignments. This is huge leverage.

                    The chair of the energy committee is a very important and powerful position, and even after Manchin betrayed Bidens supposed agenda, the Democrats still give him this immense power. Why?

                    Hes already blocking all meaningful legislation, if he wants to give up his power and go caucus with republicans then let him. Call his bluff. If he would actually switch to ® he would become just another run of the mill Republican. His donors would dry up, he wouldn’t get headlines, he wouldnt matter anymore.