“Masking propaganda that influences public opinion under the guise of providing informational material is antithetical to Wikimedia’s ‘educational’ mission.”
We probably disagree on a lot of things, but attacking Wikipedias non-profit status because of bias is just wrong. I was a treasurer on an aviation related charity that had a bias towards certain information and political positions that benefited aviation, should I have had our 501c3 status revoked?
Wikipedia has a pretty strong left leaning slant, but more power to them. I choose to just not consult them on political or historical topics, and honestly I would much rather have Wikipedia around than the slop that is ChatGPT or Gemini
Wikipedia may claim to be neutral, but even though it isn’t, that shouldn’t affect its 501© status. Non-profits are allowed to have bias. Trump’s stupid thugs are going after a very popular source of information that actually reinforces pro-US bias. Maybe they are too short-sighted to realize the value of a “limited hangout”.
We probably disagree on a lot of things, but attacking Wikipedias non-profit status because of bias is just wrong. I was a treasurer on an aviation related charity that had a bias towards certain information and political positions that benefited aviation, should I have had our 501c3 status revoked?
Wikipedia has a pretty strong left leaning slant, but more power to them. I choose to just not consult them on political or historical topics, and honestly I would much rather have Wikipedia around than the slop that is ChatGPT or Gemini