• entwine413@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, no company is going to support a product indefinitely. The first nests are 11 years old.

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They don’t need to offer support, (technical) access to the device is enough. Those devices could be used locally without issues.

      They do neither.

      It’s not surprising to me but there’s is a way beyond infinite support.

      • entwine413@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The devices can still be controlled locally, just run homeassistant (which everyone should be doing).

        • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Oh I was under the impression that nest is dependent on their API services - happy to be wrong!that said no one should use home assistant after their proxy debacle and their unwillingness to follow up on their promise to open source their remote service.

          I don’t understand why everyone is recommending them, their track record on backtracking is en pair with an enterprise…

          Edit: I don’t want to pull anyone away from home assistant, I phrased that too aggressive. I just wonder how so many people flock to it with this track record and at the same time are concerned about big tech companies. TE vendor lockin appears too me and the control lies completely in one companies hand. Even with open source core that’s just too much if a risk for me personally.

          • entwine413@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            The devices can still be used locally without issues. They’re not bricking the devices; you just can’t use their cloud service with them.