“January 6th stuck with him so well he was elected President again. At a certain point you have to admit that this country is way more full of people that eat up whatever Republicans say than you might be comfortable with.” - April 25, 2025
Reddit comment: https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1k7ga2y/trump_has_two_weeks_to_save_america_from_empty/moyay24/
What to Understand
-
Donald Trump is the most obvious liar and egomaniac since year 2013. It is blatant, it is obvious, it is clear as day, it is documented.
-
Understanding the Problem Assertion 1: The problem is not Donald Trump. One liar “Big Shot” who plays golf and spends time with his family retired in Florida on the golf course and goes and hangs out with his buddies is nothing special for a man age 70 and older.
-
Understanding the Problem Assertion 2: The problem is We The People, the population of society. “MASS PSYCHOSIS - How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL”
-
How did this happen? Assertion 3: A 1985 book by Neil Postman, Manhattan / New York University Professor (Donald Trump’s Home Town) predicted all this for America’s future. On February 2, 2017 his son Andrew Postman confirmed that Donald Trump was what his father’s book was ultimately about.
-
Understanding the Problem Assertion 4: The Theory of SOCIETAL STUPIDITY by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Nazi Germany mass conformity / collective blindness
Is this a question, or just some dude posting what random leftists think conservatives think?
is what a question? Can you provide some context, there are half a dozen links to articles all over the Internet, what exactly are you referencing that you think is a question?
::: ___________
“You can cite a hundred references to show that the biblical God is a bloodthirsty tyrant, but if they can dig up two or three verses that say ‘God is love,’ they will claim that you are taking things out of context!” ― Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist
The entire post, I don’t understand what it is.
Edit: the entire community too. This is just kinda weird. So much effort, but I don’t think you have ever had a solid conversation with a conservative, or at least off the Internet
You seem to have a bad case of “Context Blindness” or something? Were do you even see the words “conservative” anywhere here? Is the “I” in your comment referring to me, Stephen Gutknecht? or the reddit user being quoted in the posting of the title?
Are you talking about me, Stephen Gutknecht? I’ve lived in the Middle East in Islamic nation of Jordan, I’ve lived in Africa in the Islamic nation of Algeria - you think I never had a single conversation with a conservative? How did that even become part of this conversation? Are you hallucinating on your social device? I’ve talked to Muslim Clergy in a Mosque, is that too “liberal” for you?
Yha, I traveled to Algeria to talk to clergy in a Mosque via “the Internet”? You think in 1988 when I would go purchase food and work next to the Amish families in Grabill Indiana, I was talking to extreme liberals on the Internet or something? You seem to be extremely confused who you are talking to. Is your social device malfunctioning? Overheating CPU?
What exactly do you think is a question? You somehow said there is a question, can you point to the question mark? Can you do a screen shot or something?
Yha, why are you talking about “conservative”? Are you seeing something about the the Taliban in Afghanistan on your screen or something? Saudi Arabia, Mecca? Iran? Are you talking about the Amish Christian community or something? What exactly are you referencing on this Lemmy posting page?
::: ___________
“Caetextia presents itself as the inability to adjust behaviour appropriately to deal with interacting variables. People with caetextia may fail to consider the context surrounding the behaviour. This can result in people with caetextia experiencing elevated levels of frustration, anger, and anxiety when faced with a situation that requires giving attention to more than one interacting variable or factor at a time. This can be attributed to the inability to unconsciously draw upon the contextual information presented in a given situation as well as evaluate the significance of change with regards to the surrounding environment.”